Chat/Threading: Difference between revisions
mNo edit summary |
mNo edit summary |
||
| Line 42: | Line 42: | ||
* Preservation of original context | * Preservation of original context | ||
* Facilitation of supplementary explanations | * Facilitation of supplementary explanations | ||
== 2. WhatsApp Threading Potential: Contextual Conversation Branching == | == 2. WhatsApp Threading Potential: Contextual Conversation Branching == | ||
Would it be beneficial to transform message interaction from linear to contextually adaptive? | Would it be beneficial to transform message interaction from linear to contextually adaptive? | ||
| Line 75: | Line 70: | ||
* Clear visual distinction for threaded conversations | * Clear visual distinction for threaded conversations | ||
* Easy navigation between original and new threads | * Easy navigation between original and new threads | ||
''The fact that Teams is used in work contexts rather than WhatsApp by most companies makes me think that our target audience prefers structured and topic-organized conversations instead of casual ones.'' | |||
=== Supporting Evidence from Search Results === | |||
== Professional Communication Preferences == | |||
WhatsApp has significantly more total users, but Teams dominates in professional communication contexts | |||
https://www.businessofapps.com/data/microsoft-teams-statistics/ | |||
== User Experience Insights == | |||
* WhatsApp excels in casual, personal communication | |||
* Teams is designed for professional users | |||
* The choice depends on prioritizing powerful features vs. simplicity | |||
''Can we use the semplicity of WhtsApp UI and making it more powerful in terms of organized conversations?'' | |||