Jump to content
Main menu
Main menu
move to sidebar
hide
Navigation
Main page
Recent changes
Random page
Help about MediaWiki
UX Parula
Search
Search
Appearance
Create account
Log in
Personal tools
Create account
Log in
Pages for logged out editors
learn more
Contributions
Talk
Editing
Mail/Threading/Comparative
(section)
Page
Discussion
English
Read
Edit
Edit source
View history
Tools
Tools
move to sidebar
hide
Actions
Read
Edit
Edit source
View history
General
What links here
Related changes
Special pages
Page information
Get shortened URL
Appearance
move to sidebar
hide
Warning:
You are not logged in. Your IP address will be publicly visible if you make any edits. If you
log in
or
create an account
, your edits will be attributed to your username, along with other benefits.
Anti-spam check. Do
not
fill this in!
== Gmail (Web app) == [[File:Gmail.jpg|alt=Gmail Threading|thumb|Gmail Threading]] Gmail's threading stacks conversation messages with the newest unread message on top and the last two emails of a thread, prioritizing usability over precise message hierarchy and '''intentionally''' allowing users to expand the rest of the messages. Gmail groups emails if each message meets the following criteria: * The same recipients, senders, or subjects as previous emails. * A reference header with the identical IDs as an earlier message. * Sent within one week of an earlier message. Gmail will break an email thread if the subject line changes or the email chain grows beyond 100 emails. Asking myself, is there enough context for the user? '''Context from intermediate messages can be lost''', potentially leading to misunderstandings or incomplete information. The condensed view might not provide enough information for users to decide whether to open a thread or not. Also the system could automatically groups messages that are nor supposed to be grouped.
Summary:
Please note that all contributions to UX Parula may be edited, altered, or removed by other contributors. If you do not want your writing to be edited mercilessly, then do not submit it here.
You are also promising us that you wrote this yourself, or copied it from a public domain or similar free resource (see
UX Parula:Copyrights
for details).
Do not submit copyrighted work without permission!
Cancel
Editing help
(opens in new window)