Mail/Threading/Comparative: Difference between revisions

(12 intermediate revisions by one other user not shown)

Line 16:

The '''subject''' seems to '''appear on all messages under the same thread'''. I'm asking myself whether it is necessary or if '''it clutters the space''' without much point.

== Gmail (~~Windows desktop~~ app) ==

== Gmail (Web app) ==

[[File:Gmail.jpg|alt=Gmail Threading|thumb|Gmail Threading]]

Gmail's threading stacks conversation messages with the newest unread message on top and the last two emails of a thread, prioritizing usability over precise message hierarchy and '''intentionally''' allowing users to expand the rest of the messages.

Line 33:

== Outlook ==

Outlook groups emails with the same subject line into conversations, but changes in subject lines can create new threads or split existing ones. Users report issues with conversations being grouped randomly or incorrectly, especially when dealing with similar subject lines but different recipients. Threading large numbers of emails can be resource-intensive, affecting Outlook's responsiveness.

== Apple ~~mail~~ ==

One person during my surveys mention his difficulty in determining where messages in a thread start and end, because of the plain UI and just a thin devider.

By default, Apple Mail will group emails from the same thread ~~(or conversation) instead~~ of ~~showing individual email messages~~.

== Apple Mail ==

By default, Apple Mail will group emails from the same thread. There is a feature that highlights time-sensitive emails at the top of the inbox, integrating with the threading system. Apple Intelligence provides short summaries of emails and entire threads directly in the inbox, helping users quickly grasp the content. The threading can sometimes show only the latest message in the thread, possible to change settings.

== Missive ==

Threading is considered a core feature and cannot be turned off, unlike some email clients, Missive keeps threading enabled at all times. Individual emails can be moved out of a thread into a new conversation if needed. Before December 2024, Missive was threading incoming replies with different subjects, no longer the case.

== Super ~~human~~ ==

== Super Humans ==

In Super Human there is Auto-Summarize, a Superhuman AI feature which summarizes the entire email chain, giving you the key information without having to dig through each email.Team members can have private discussions within email threads without risk of accidentally sharing with external recipients.

Super Humans can naturally identify when a conversation within a thread shifts to a new topic, even if the subject line remains unchanged. In Super Human there is Auto-Summarize, a Superhuman AI feature which summarizes the entire email chain, giving you the key information without having to dig through each email. Team members can have private discussions within email threads without risk of accidentally sharing with external recipients.

== Spark ==

Spark seems to have an interesting threading system, which goes beyond simple chronological ordering. It uses advanced algorithms to group related emails together, even if they have different subject lines or involve multiple participants. It allows users to mute entire threads, and snoozing them temporarily removing them from the inbox and having them reappear at a specified time.

For long email threads, Spark provides a summary view from December 2023, allowing users to quickly catch up on the key points of the conversation without reading through every message. This Ai Summary feature, generates a brief 1-2 paragraph overview of the email thread or action points highlighting the necessary actions within the email.

Line 47:

Line 55:

== Commun issues with email threading ==

According to ~~app~~ reviews in the internet we can say that some of the most ~~comune~~ issues about their threading system are:

According to user reviews in the internet we can say that some of the most commun issues about their threading system are:

=== Email threads can get too long ===

Line 56:

Line 64:

* Find specific information or decisions

* Identify new responses or updates

* Keep track of the overall conversation

* Keep track of the overall conversation - scrolling through long threads becomes cumbersome

* Attachments can sometimes cause problems within threads - becoming hard to locate or disappearing

~~=== Technical Limitations ===~~

~~Several technical issues can arise with email threading:~~

* Not all email clients support threading, which can disrupt the conversation flow

* Attachments can sometimes cause problems within threads

~~=== Difficulty in Managing Long Threads ===~~

~~As threads grow, they become harder to manage:~~

* Scrolling through long threads becomes cumbersome

* Quoted text within emails gets narrower and harder to ~~read~~

* Important messages within the thread may be overlooked

=== More ===

Line 75:

Line 71:

* Redundant or irrelevant responses due to not reviewing the entire thread

* Difficulty in following conversations when subject lines or participants change

* Accidental replies to the wrong person or message

* Problems with attachments disappearing or becoming hard to locate

* Risk of sending sensitive information to unintended recipients

* Confusion when email clients handle threading differently

* Side topics cluttering the main conversation

* Increased time spent scrolling through lengthy threads

Feel free to add more issues you are encoutering with mail threading!

* Context-dependent communication leading to ~~misunderstandings~~

~~=== In General ===~~

* The lack of customization options that would allow users to tailor the interface to their specific preferences and work styles

* The tendency of interface design discussions to revolve around layout and click efficiency, rather than addressing the varied needs of different user types.

~~== Our Ideas ==~~

~~Mail threading~~

* Simplified Thread Summary: We'll display a concise summary at the top or left side, we don't repeat the subject, we show only the person, and on the very right, we show the date. Also, between the person and the date, we show the tags if there's anything. And if you click on any of the names, then you ~~scroll to that message. And then you can have another button to to jump back on. When we see the actual messages below, all of them~~ are ~~expanded.~~

* Adaptive Indentation: We'll use very small indentation to show reply relationships. The indentation will adjust based on screen width to ensure optimal message display. Up to a certain maximum because we have a minimum amount of width that we show a message. And if you are reaching that minimum, we don't intend any forever because otherwise we can show the messages.

* Customizable View: Maybe we will add an expand/collapse toggle to let users choose between seeing full messages or condensed previews, with ~~the default set to expanded view for maximum information~~

@@ Line 16: / Line 16: @@
 The '''subject''' seems to '''appear on all messages under the same thread'''. I'm asking myself whether it is necessary or if '''it clutters the space''' without much point.
-== Gmail (Windows desktop app) ==
+== Gmail (Web app) ==
 [[File:Gmail.jpg|alt=Gmail Threading|thumb|Gmail Threading]]
 Gmail's threading stacks conversation messages with the newest unread message on top and the last two emails of a thread, prioritizing usability over precise message hierarchy and '''intentionally''' allowing users to expand the rest of the messages.
@@ Line 33: / Line 33: @@
 == Outlook ==
+Outlook groups emails with the same subject line into conversations, but changes in subject lines can create new threads or split existing ones. Users report issues with conversations being grouped randomly or incorrectly, especially when dealing with similar subject lines but different recipients. Threading large numbers of emails can be resource-intensive, affecting Outlook's responsiveness.
-== Apple mail ==
+One person during my surveys mention his difficulty in determining where messages in a thread start and end, because of the plain UI and just a thin devider.
-By default, Apple Mail will group emails from the same thread (or conversation) instead of showing individual email messages.
+== Apple Mail ==
+By default, Apple Mail will group emails from the same thread. There is a feature that highlights time-sensitive emails at the top of the inbox, integrating with the threading system. Apple Intelligence provides short summaries of emails and entire threads directly in the inbox, helping users quickly grasp the content. The threading can sometimes show only the latest message in the thread, possible to change settings.
 == Missive ==
 Threading is considered a core feature and cannot be turned off, unlike some email clients, Missive keeps threading enabled at all times. Individual emails can be moved out of a thread into a new conversation if needed. Before December 2024, Missive was threading incoming replies with different subjects, no longer the case.
-== Super human ==
+== Super Humans ==
-In Super Human there is Auto-Summarize, a Superhuman AI feature which summarizes the entire email chain, giving you the key information without having to dig through each email.Team members can have private discussions within email threads without risk of accidentally sharing with external recipients.
+Super Humans can naturally identify when a conversation within a thread shifts to a new topic, even if the subject line remains unchanged. In Super Human there is Auto-Summarize, a Superhuman AI feature which summarizes the entire email chain, giving you the key information without having to dig through each email. Team members can have private discussions within email threads without risk of accidentally sharing with external recipients.
+== Spark ==
+Spark seems to have an interesting threading system, which goes beyond simple chronological ordering. It uses advanced algorithms to group related emails together, even if they have different subject lines or involve multiple participants. It allows users to mute entire threads, and snoozing them temporarily removing them from the inbox and having them reappear at a specified time.
+For long email threads, Spark provides a summary view from December 2023, allowing users to quickly catch up on the key points of the conversation without reading through every message. This Ai Summary feature, generates a brief 1-2 paragraph overview of the email thread or action points highlighting the necessary actions within the email.
@@ Line 47: / Line 55: @@
 == Commun issues with email threading ==
-According to app reviews in the internet we can say that some of the most comune issues about their threading system are:
+According to user reviews in the internet we can say that some of the most commun issues about their threading system are:
 === Email threads can get too long ===
@@ Line 56: / Line 64: @@
 * Find specific information or decisions
 * Identify new responses or updates
-* Keep track of the overall conversation
+* Keep track of the overall conversation - scrolling through long threads becomes cumbersome
+* Attachments can sometimes cause problems within threads - becoming hard to locate or disappearing
-=== Technical Limitations ===
-Several technical issues can arise with email threading:
-* Not all email clients support threading, which can disrupt the conversation flow
-* Attachments can sometimes cause problems within threads
-=== Difficulty in Managing Long Threads ===
-As threads grow, they become harder to manage:
-* Scrolling through long threads becomes cumbersome
-* Quoted text within emails gets narrower and harder to read
-* Important messages within the thread may be overlooked
 === More ===
@@ Line 75: / Line 71: @@
 * Redundant or irrelevant responses due to not reviewing the entire thread
 * Difficulty in following conversations when subject lines or participants change
-* Accidental replies to the wrong person or message
-* Problems with attachments disappearing or becoming hard to locate
 * Risk of sending sensitive information to unintended recipients
-* Confusion when email clients handle threading differently
 * Side topics cluttering the main conversation
-* Increased time spent scrolling through lengthy threads
+Feel free to add more issues you are encoutering with mail threading!
-* Context-dependent communication leading to misunderstandings
-=== In General ===
-* The lack of customization options that would allow users to tailor the interface to their specific preferences and work styles
-* The tendency of interface design discussions to revolve around layout and click efficiency, rather than addressing the varied needs of different user types.
-== Our Ideas ==
-Mail threading
-* Simplified Thread Summary: We'll display a concise summary at the top or left side, we don't repeat the subject, we show only the person, and on the very right, we show the date. Also, between the person and the date, we show the tags if there's anything. And if you click on any of the names, then you scroll to that message. And then you can have another button to to jump back on. When we see the actual messages below, all of them are expanded.
-* Adaptive Indentation: We'll use very small indentation to show reply relationships. The indentation will adjust based on screen width to ensure optimal message display. Up to a certain maximum because we have a minimum amount of width that we show a message. And if you are reaching that minimum, we don't intend any forever because otherwise we can show the messages.
-* Customizable View: Maybe we will add an expand/collapse toggle to let users choose between seeing full messages or condensed previews, with the default set to expanded view for maximum information