Mail/Threading/Comparative: Difference between revisions
mNo edit summary |
mNo edit summary |
||
| Line 31: | Line 31: | ||
Also the system could automatically groups messages that are nor supposed to be grouped. | Also the system could automatically groups messages that are nor supposed to be grouped. | ||
== Outlook == | |||
== Apple mail == | |||
By default, Apple Mail will group emails from the same thread (or conversation) instead of showing individual email messages. | |||
== Missive == | |||
Threading is considered a core feature and cannot be turned off, unlike some email clients, Missive keeps threading enabled at all times. Individual emails can be moved out of a thread into a new conversation if needed. As of December 2024, Missive no longer threads incoming replies with different subjects, improving conversation organization. | |||
== Super human == | |||
In Super Human there is Auto-Summarize, a Superhuman AI feature which summarizes the entire email chain, giving you the key information without having to dig through each email.Team members can have private discussions within email threads without risk of accidentally sharing with external recipients. | |||
P.S. I could add only the pictures of the software I am using due to copyrights. Feel free to ask Google. | |||
== Commun issues with email threading == | == Commun issues with email threading == | ||
According to app reviews in the internet we can say that some of the most comune issues about their threading system are: | |||
=== Email threads can get too long === | === Email threads can get too long === | ||
| Line 73: | Line 88: | ||
* The tendency of interface design discussions to revolve around layout and click efficiency, rather than addressing the varied needs of different user types. | * The tendency of interface design discussions to revolve around layout and click efficiency, rather than addressing the varied needs of different user types. | ||
== Our | == Our Ideas == | ||
Mail threading | Mail threading | ||