Mail/Threading/UserStudies: Difference between revisions

Elenuzza (talk | contribs)
mNo edit summary
Ricccardo: Make readable
Line 7: Line 7:
*Work: Channel Program Analyst, London
*Work: Channel Program Analyst, London
How many times I check my emails: all day during working hours.
How many times I check my emails: all day during working hours.


==  '''Mattia N - 23.01.25''' ==
==  '''Mattia N - 23.01.25''' ==
Line 44: Line 39:


I am not able to tell you if I'd like your idea, I am not used to see it. Also, people don't have often an image in the avatar, so one character is hard to interpret.
I am not able to tell you if I'd like your idea, I am not used to see it. Also, people don't have often an image in the avatar, so one character is hard to interpret.
== '''Riccardo B''' - '''22.01.25''' ==
== '''Riccardo B''' - '''22.01.25''' ==


Line 70: Line 61:
'''Feedback to our UX idea'''
'''Feedback to our UX idea'''


Yes, great.
Yes, great. Indeed, I cannot see a better way to select the content that we want to see. Good idea.
 
Difficult to be more selective in choosing the content we want to see than that, indeed. Good idea.
 
But not applicable in my company, we have so many security policies that they were not even allowing me to download Adobe.


Due to the projects with the clients. Already in the past they had secutiry issues. I think you should consider that.
Your idea is certainly intriguing. In my specific situation, its relevance is somewhat limited, because I don't often deal with lengthy discussion threads. However, based on my observations of others' experiences, I can see how this could be a valuable concept.


Maybe your target can be less structured companies. Difficult for the IT department to approve a software different from what they are using.
==== Installing Parula ====
Unfortunately, in my company, our security policies do not allow me to install other software, so I cannot install Parula. It is difficult for the IT department to approve a software different from what they are already using. We have valuable client data that we need to protect. Maybe your target can be less structured companies.


Your idea is certainly intriguing. In my specific situation, its relevance is somewhat limited as I don't often deal with lengthy discussion threads. However, based on my observations of others' experiences, I can see how this could be a valuable concept. It's an interesting idea.